My ideas on changing the law in pursuit of public interest, in particular: conflict resolution.
RULE: The purpose of this blog is to encourage discussion. I am totally aware that my opinions usually vacillate between the cynical and the idealistic, and this is my attempt, before I take the bar, to “come clean.” Thus I subject myself to you for debate. Don’t hold back.
HOLDINGS:
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Reflections on Francois Roux, awesome conflict map by my coworker, Will Xu
Presenting my awesome coworker Will, who does great stuff.....
http://omyscience.blogspot.nl/2013/07/the-esquire.html
theatl.as
Monday, July 22, 2013
Friday, July 12, 2013
Absolutely awesome film on the ECCC and defense of Duch, head of S-21, and Francois Roux, now head of defense at the STL
The Khmer Rouge and the Man of Non-Violence
http://www.lesfilmsdici.fr/en/catalog/966-khmer-rouge-et-le-non-violent-le.html
Profile of Francois Roux, my new role model:
http://www.stl-tsl.org/en/about-the-stl/key-characters/head-of-defence-office-francois-roux
Some writing about the dramatic Duch closing arguments, with the defense divided, the court asking if they are pleading guilty or asking for an acquittal:
http://www.cambodiatribunal.org/taxonomy/term/50
Quotes from Francois Roux closing argument, incredibly moving and deeply philosophical, to come soon hopefully.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
The Breaker is Broke....
This Professor almost singlehandedly broke me 1L year. This should be interesting....
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23628967/du-professor-files-gender-based-lt-br-gt
The Denver Post
Read more:DU professor files gender-based wage-bias case against law school - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23628967/du-professor-files-gender-based-lt-br-gt#ixzz2YdIqFVNY
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Follow us:@Denverpost on Twitter|Denverpost on Facebook
http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23628967/du-professor-files-gender-based-lt-br-gt
LOCAL NEWS
DU professor files gender-based wage-bias case against law school
POSTED: 07/09/2013 05:31:39 PM MDT
UPDATED: 07/10/2013 12:16:55 AM MDT
By Colleen O'ConnorUPDATED: 07/10/2013 12:16:55 AM MDT
The Denver Post
University of Denver professor Lucy Marsh on Tuesday filed a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging that Sturm College of Law violated federal law by paying her less than a man in a similar job and failed to correct the inequity when it had the chance.
DU spokeswoman Kim DeVigil declined to comment on the filing. "We do not discuss active complaints, nor do we discuss confidential personnel information."
The filing comes a month after the EEOC, the agency responsible for enforcing federal anti-discrimination laws, marked the50th anniversary of the Equal Pay Actby prioritizing pay discrimination as one of the six top issues of the next three years.
According to the EEOC, in 2012 women in general earned 77 percent of what men made, and at the current rate of progression, the gender wage gap will not close until 2057.
"What I hope comes out of this is not just fair compensation to professor Marsh and to fix the system, but hopefully there will be lessons learned that other universities, law schools and employers can look at and say, 'This is something that we can look at, to make sure the women are not paid less for equal work,' " said Jennifer Reisch, one of Marsh's lawyers and legal director ofEqual Rights Advocates, a national civil rights organization.
According to the Tuesday filing, the charge of discrimination arises from the "stark inequality between the salaries of male and female full professors" at Sturm College of Law. According to the filing, Marsh is the lowest paid professor, earning $109,000 per year, compared with the median full-professor salary of $149,000.
"Professor Marsh believes that she and other female professors at the law school were discriminated against with respect to compensation because of their gender and were paid less than men performing substantially equal work under similar conditions in the same establishment," the filing says.
Documents filed in the case include a December 2012 memo from Dean Martin Katz to the faculty about the allocation of funds for law-school pay raises.
He said the funds, received as part of the university-wide Faculty Salary Competitiveness Initiative designed to attract and retain top academic talent, would be given to the top 25 performers at the school, with the goal of getting them closer to their competitive target salaries.
In a section on gender-based salary equity, he said this round of raises "were applied 'without regard to trying to correct potential inequities.' "
The memo showed that the wage gap for full-time professors widened further after the recent raises. It said the median salary for female full-time professors was $7,532 a year less than for males before this round of raises and $11,282 a year less than that for men after this round of raises. The mean salary for female full-time professors was $14,870 a year less than that for men before this round of raises and $15,859 a year less than for males after this round of raises.
"I was absolutely shocked to see that discrepancy and that blatant admission of discrepancy and to see it is getting worse," Marsh said in a phone interview.
Marsh, who began teaching at DU in 1973 and became a full professor in 1982, had never asked for a raise. She hadn't even thought about pay parity until another female law professor —Ann Scales, a founder of the field of feminist legal theory— first raised the issue.
According to documents in the case, after Katz announced that the university had earmarked funds for law school faculty raises, Scales expressed concerns about gender inequity in faculty salaries and asked that the additional funds be used to remedy any inequities.
Scales' inquiries in spring of 2012 began mildly but escalated when Katz declined to respond to her request for reassurances there was no gender inequality at the law school, Marsh said.
She got "a bit more fiery," Marsh said, because pay equity "is not something done out of consideration. It's the law."
Scales died in June 2012 from massive brain trauma after falling down the stairs at her home.
"I thought that in her honor I would continue her crusade and make sure to get an answer," Marsh said.
She scheduled a meeting withKatz, who specializes in employment and anti-discrimination law.
Although Marsh had detailed her concerns and asked for specific data on faculty salaries in an e-mail to Katz before that meeting, documents filed with the EEOC say Katz "was unwilling to give Prof. Marsh much of the information she requested, did not know her starting salary or her DU target salary, and presented incorrect information regarding (her) start date and publications."
He did, however, tell her that she was the lowest paid professor on the faculty.
Marsh's current salary is $109,000. Katz said her competitive target salary is $181,000.
"I was very, very surprised," Marsh said. "At the end of the meeting, I asked what he was going to do about it, and he said, 'nothing.' "
She felt something had to be done.
"I decided I would be the best one to bring litigation or turn the spotlight on this because I have a very strong teaching record, and I'm not just starting my career," Marsh said.
Marsh, the daughter ofThompson Marsh, a respected DU law school professor, is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School. Her professional experience includes working for Dale Tooley at the Denver District Attorney's office 1976-79 and serving on the Colorado Real Estate Commission from 1977-82, appointed by former Gov. Richard Lamm.
She has received professional honors from"The Colorado Lawyer"and the Denver Bar Association, and in 2010she won the "Excellence in Teaching" award at the school's annual Law Stars fundraiser.
At DU, she teaches classes in trusts and estates and civil procedure, and she recently startedthe Tribal Wills Project, supervising students drafting wills pro bono on the Southern Ute and Ute Mountain reservations in Colorado. This program is an extension of the Wills Lab, a clinical program she created nearly 30 years ago in which law students work with practicing attorneys to draft wills for low-income clients.
"Most people would be astonished that it would be possible for someone of her caliber and commitment to be the worst paid of the full-time professors at the school," Reisch said.
Baine Kerr, a Boulder lawyer who also represents Marsh, said that they tried to remedy the wage equity issue before filing the discrimination charge but received no response from DU.
"We are skeptical that there are actual justifications," he said, "both because of the apparently systemic ... character of the discrepancies and because if there were actual justifications, we would have heard about them."
As for Marsh, she's prepared for a tough road.
"You are taking a risk with something like this," she said. "They will try to point out everything I have ever done wrong. I think they will come up empty-handed. But I was a litigator once, and I know they try to tear people apart."
Colleen O'Connor: 303-954-1083, coconnor@denverpost.com or twitter.com/coconnordp
Read more:DU professor files gender-based wage-bias case against law school - The Denver Posthttp://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23628967/du-professor-files-gender-based-lt-br-gt#ixzz2YdIqFVNY
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
Follow us:@Denverpost on Twitter|Denverpost on Facebook
Tuesday, July 9, 2013
U.S. Domestic Prosecutors and International Criminal Prosecutors -is there a difference?
So, I work for the Office of the Prosecutor. Back when I was at school, our professor was trying to help those of us going to work at international tribunals to raise some money for the summer. We tried to create a CLE on international criminal law (but failed...) But during that time, I was in the Career Development Office (CDO) having them send out invites to all their contacts who might be interested. As they were considering emailing the group of CO public defenders, they hesitated, saying that they shouldn't indicate that we would all be interning for international tribunal's prosecutors, because defense and prosecution don't like to attend events supporting each other.
This could be only one person's viewpoint, but it got me thinking. I never considered international criminal prosecutors and U.S. domestic prosecutors of the same part and parcel. (Disclaimer -what I am about to say has nothing to do with what I think of prosecutors, it just had to do with how I would feel if I was one. I have great respect for prosecutors, I just don't know how I myself would deal with the ethical issues that arise from being part of a system that I might not have that much ability to impact). International prosecutors are prosecuting perpetrators of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. They are the "big guys" who orchestrated a whole country to do things the whole world has agreed are bad (no small undertaking). U.S. domestic prosecutors, from my understanding, largely go after the "little guy" -people that are by no means innocent but are part of a larger picture of systematic oppression. I hate throwing these terms around without really knowing what I am talking about, so I actually started collecting everything that I read that leads me to this conclusion. Most recently, it was Correction Unit, an essay by Jonathan Franzen in his collection How to Be Alone. I would welcome anyone's feedback, disagreement, thoughts on this. I hope no one gets offended, but this is how I explained it, in simplified terms. I would feel bad as a U.S. domestic prosecutor, I don't as an international criminal prosecutor.
Since that conversation, I have been taking surveys of my peers and others who might have something to offer on the conversation. For the most part, people don't agree with me. Their arguments can be summarized similar to what I often hear about defense, defending heinous criminals, etc. Its about defending the process, not the individuals. Recently, a law student was visiting the STL to see if he was interested in working in international criminal law. A bunch of interns got together to go meet him for coffee, and I asked our supervisor to join us. I raised the question to all of them -do you see a major "moral" (for lack of a better word) difference between being an international criminal prosecutor and a U.S. domestic prosecutor. Our supervisor took the helm, and his ultimate conclusion was the same -prosecutors everywhere, when they set to their goals, are of the same mindset. Maybe not necessarily to get a conviction, but to do the best job for their case. Then we started talking about how being a U.S. prosecutor is different than perhaps being a prosecutor in another country, because of the nature of our criminal justice system. We spent a lot of time talking about how the sentencing in the U.S. is so extreme compared to other countries, it is somewhat on the level of Saudi Arabia. Our supervisor is French. He said you could get caught smoking a joint in France once and nothing will happen, eventually you might get a fine, jail would be harsh. But while he was visiting NYC, he decided to sit in on a court session, and was shocked to find that a nice young girl who had held the door for him on the way in was called up, convicted of smoking a joint, and sentenced to jail for 4 months. He recognized that she might have had a criminal history, but still, this conviction was shocking to him.
Anyway, at this point maybe my inquiry should stop. No matter where I go, it seems that both prosecutors and defense deal with the ethical issues that arise in their professions by dedicating themselves to the process. What worries me, however, is when we are all siloed in our respective roles -who is looking out for the bigger picture? The American people? I fear we have become too disinterested...
Any thoughts?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)